Subject
The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology is a peer-reviewed journal of epidemiology. The journal was originally established as the Journal of Chronic Diseases in 1955 as a follow-up to Harry S. Truman's 1951 Presidential Task Force on national health concerns and the subsequently written Magnuson Report.Under the editorial leadership of Alvan Feinstein and Walter O. Spitzer, the title of the journal was changed to the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology with the January 1988 issue. The current editors are André Knottnerus (Netherlands School of Primary Care Research) and Peter Tugwell (University of Ottawa).According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2020 Impact Factor of 6.437, ranking it 5th out of 108 journals in the category "Health Care Sciences & Services". উৎস: Wikipedia (en)
Editions published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 200
অনেকগুলো সত্তার অনুরোধ করা হয়েছে (6734)। শুধুমাত্র 200 প্রদর্শিত হয়।
-
Reporting and methods for handling missing participant data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic survey
-
Reporting quality and optimal methods of handling participants with missing outcome data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic survey of the methods literature
-
42 systematic reviews generated 23 items for assessing the risk of bias in Values and Preferences´ studies
-
Adjusting for unmeasured confounding in non-randomised longitudinal studies: a methodological review
-
Reporting of Bayesian analysis in epidemiologic research should become more transparent
-
Frameworks for adaptation of health guidelines: a methodological survey
-
Survival biases lead to flawed conclusions in observational treatment studies of influenza patients
-
Outcomes mapping study for childhood vaccination communication: too few concepts were measured in too many ways
-
Retrospectively patient reported pre-event health status showed strong association and agreement with contemporaneous reports
-
The reporting of studies using routinely collected health data was often insufficient
-
UK publicly funded Clinical Trials Units supported a controlled access approach to share individual participant data but highlighted concerns
-
Criteria for use of composite end points for competing risks-a systematic survey of the literature with recommendations
-
Published randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa focus on high-burden diseases but are frequently funded and led by high-income countries
-
A systematic review finds limited data on measurement properties of instruments measuring outcomes in adult intensive care unit survivors.
-
Bibliographic study showed improving statistical methodology of network meta-analyses published between 1999 and 2015.
-
Randomized trials addressing a similar question are commonly published after a trial stopped early for benefit
-
Registry-based randomized controlled trials- what are the advantages, challenges, and areas for future research?
-
Primary Outcomes Reporting in Trials (PORTal): a systematic review of inadequate reporting in pediatric randomized controlled trials
-
A very low number of national adaptations of the World Health Organization guidelines for HIV and tuberculosis reported their processes
-
Authors seldom report the most patient-important outcomes and absolute effect measures in systematic review abstracts
-
Methods for detecting, quantifying, and adjusting for dissemination bias in meta-analysis are described
-
A systematic review of discontinued trials suggested that most reasons for recruitment failure were preventable
-
Limited responsiveness related to the minimal important difference of patient-reported outcomes in rare diseases
-
A systematic review reveals that the credibility of subgroup claims in low back pain trials was low.
-
A measurement framework for adherence in patient decision aid trials applied in a systematic review subanalysis
-
Active recruitment and limited participant-load related to high participation in large population-based biobank studies
-
Reporting of core items in hierarchical Bayesian analysis for aggregating N-of-1 trials to estimate population treatment effects is suboptimal
-
Content validity across methods of malnutrition assessment in patients with cancer is limited
-
A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method.
-
Health care articles with simple and declarative titles were more likely to be in the Altmetric Top 100.
-
PROMIS measures of pain, fatigue, negative affect, physical function, and social function demonstrated clinical validity across a range of chronic conditions
-
Assessment of vibration of effects due to model specification can demonstrate the instability of observational associations
Subject - wd:Q6294959