Inventaire - your friends and communities are your best library

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias

author

Douglas G. Altman

1948 - 2018

John Ioannidis

1965 -

published in: PLOS One

date of publication: 2008-08-28

language: English

main subject: publishing, biomedical investigative technique, bias, systematic review

Cites articles 37

Date

Title

Authors

2008-04-01

Publication and non-publication of clinical trials: longitudinal study of applications submitted to a research ethics committee

Erik von Elm, Anette Blümle
2007-04-18

Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts

Erik von Elm
2007-03-06

Application and investigation of a bound for outcome reporting bias

Ley Sander, Carrol Gamble, Paula Williamson
2007-11-01

[Evaluation of clinical trials following an approval from a research ethics committee]
2006-10-02

Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement

Robert L. Kane
2006-06-22

Impact of funding on biomedical research: a retrospective cohort study
2006-10-01

An empirical evaluation of multifarious outcomes in pharmacogenetics: beta-2 adrenoceptor gene polymorphisms in asthma treatment

Despina Contopoulos-Ioannidis, John Ioannidis
2005-10-01

Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis
2005-06-20

Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study
2005-06-03

Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias

Hans-Hermann Dubben, Hans-Peter Beck-Bornholdt
2005-02-01

Evaluation of new treatments in radiation oncology: are they better than standard treatments?

Iztok Hozo, Benjamin Djulbegovic
2005-01-28

Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors

Douglas G. Altman
2005-05-01

Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta-analysis
2004-09-28

Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Douglas G. Altman, Karmela Krleza-Jerić
2004-05-26

Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles

Peter C. Gøtzsche, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Mette Ewers Haahr, Douglas G. Altman
2004-01-01

Factors influencing the publication of health research
2004-01-01

Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

Benjamin Djulbegovic
2004-11-01

Effect sizes in cumulative meta-analyses of mental health randomized trials evolved over time.

Kristian Wahlbeck, John Ioannidis, Thomas Trikalinos
2003-05-01

Evidence b(i)ased medicine--selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications
2003-03-01

Role of a research ethics committee in follow-up and publication of results.
2002-06-05

Publication bias in editorial decision making

Kay Dickersin, Joseph Hogan, Drummond Rennie, Annette Flanagin, Carin M Olson, Jennifer Reiling, Brian Pace
2002-08-01

Investigation of within-study selective reporting in clinical research: follow-up of applications submitted to a local research ethics committee.
2002-06-01

Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality

Matthias Egger, Peter Jüni, Karin Huwiler-Müntener
2001-01-30

Evolution of treatment effects over time: empirical insight from recursive cumulative metaanalyses

John Ioannidis
2001-11-01

Effect of early patient enrollment on the time to completion and publication of randomized controlled trials
2000-01-01

Publication and related biases

Lelia Duley
1998-08-01

Bias in reporting clinical trials
1998-07-01

Publication bias and research on passive smoking: comparison of published and unpublished studies.
1998-01-01

Effect of the statistical significance of results on the time to completion and publication of randomized efficacy trials
1997-09-01

Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects
1997-02-01

How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data
1996-02-01

False-positive results in clinical trials: multiple significance tests and the problem of unreported comparisons.

Ian F. Tannock

Article - wd:Q29619094

Welcome to Inventaire

the library of your friends and communities

learn more