Inventaire - your friends and communities are your best library

The ups and downs of peer review

author

Yawar Qadri

published in: Advances in Physiology Education

date of publication: 2007-06-01

main subject: peer review

Cites articles 41

Date

Title

Authors

2006-01-01

Stem cells. ...and how the problems eluded peer reviewers and editors

Jennifer Couzin-Frankel
2006-04-01

Second-order peer review of the medical literature for clinical practitioners

Nancy L. Wilczynski
2006-04-01

Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance

Harlan M. Krumholz, Mayur M Desai, Joseph S. Ross, Cary P Gross
2005-06-01

Ethics and scientific publication
2005-12-15

Internet encyclopaedias go head to head

Jim Giles
2005-12-01

Stem cell research. Korean cloner admits lying about oocyte donations.

Constance Holden
2005-01-01

Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal
2003-12-01

How to review a paper
2003-01-01

Impartial judgment by the "gatekeepers" of science: fallibility and accountability in the peer review process
2002-12-01

Does declaration of competing interests affect readers' perceptions? A randomised trial

Sara Schroter
2002-06-01

Postpublication criticism and the shaping of clinical knowledge

Richard Horton
1999-12-01

Biases in medical literature.
1999-09-01

One editor's views on conflict of interest
1999-01-01

Basic philosophy and concepts underlying scientific peer review.
1999-01-02

Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial
1999-10-01

Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review
1998-07-15

Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts
1998-07-01

Masking author identity in peer review: what factors influence masking success? PEER Investigators

Michael Callaham, Drummond Rennie
1998-07-15

Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports

Fiona Godlee
1998-07-01

Financial interest and its disclosure in scientific publications

Sheldon Krimsky
1998-07-01

Changes to manuscripts during the editorial process: characterizing the evolution of a clinical paper.
1998-07-01

Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial
1997-03

Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation

J. Scott Armstrong
1997-04-17

The Messenger under Attack — Intimidation of Researchers by Special-Interest Groups

Gil Omenn, Bruce M. Psaty
1994-07-01

Effect of institutional prestige on reviewers' recommendations and editorial decisions
1994-07-01

Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process?
1994-07-01

Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine
1994-07-01

Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable
1994-07-01

A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review
1990-03-01

The evolution of editorial peer review
1990-03-01

Biomedical information, peer review, and conflict of interest as they influence public health
1990-03-01

Variation in journal peer review systems. Possible causes and consequences

Article - wd:Q34636617

Welcome to Inventaire

the library of your friends and communities

learn more