Inventaire - your friends and communities are your best library - Inventaire

In response to Ballantyne and Schaefer’s ‘Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research’

author

Nilay Hepgul

Richard Dobson

published in: Journal of Medical Ethics

date of publication: 2019-01-07

main subject: data ethics, research ethics, medical ethics

Cites articles 9

Date

Title

Authors

2018-01-22

Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research.

Angela Ballantyne
2018-06-25

CogStack - experiences of deploying integrated information retrieval and extraction services in a large National Health Service Foundation Trust hospital

Richard George Jackson, Angus Roberts, Amos A Folarin, Robert Stewart, Richard Dobson, Tudor Groza
2013-08-01

Permission to contact (PTC)--a strategy to enhance patient engagement in translational research

Suzanne M Vercauteren, Sheila O'Donoghue
2010-11-11

Public attitudes to the use in research of personal health information from general practitioners' records: a survey of the Irish general public

Anne E. MacFarlane, Brian S Buckley
2005-09-28

Patients' attitudes towards sharing their health information
2004-02-01

Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study

Michael Robling
2003-02-01

Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data

Karim Keshavjee
2003-04-01

Patient privacy and confidentiality.
2002-05-18

Consent, confidentiality, and the threat to public health surveillance

Angus Nicoll

Article - wd:Q62840257

Welcome to Inventaire

the library of your friends and communities

you are offline